[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13866674#comment-13866674
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10147:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12622175/HBASE-10147-v5.patch
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12622175
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.1 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:red}-1 release audit{color}. The applied patch generated 4 release
audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 0 warnings).
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 site{color}. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to
fail.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//testReport/
Release audit warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8377//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Canary additions
> ----------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10147
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10147
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Gustavo Anatoly
> Attachments: HBASE-10147-v2.patch, HBASE-10147-v3.patch,
> HBASE-10147-v4.patch, HBASE-10147-v5.patch, HBASE-10147.patch,
> HBASE-10147.patch, HBASE-10147.patch, HBASE-10147.patch
>
>
> I've been using the canary to quickly identify the dodgy machine in my
> cluster. It is useful for this. What would make it better would be:
> + Rather than saying how long it took to get a region after you have gotten
> the region, it'd be sweet to log BEFORE you went to get the region the
> regionname and the server it is on. I ask for this because as is, I have to
> wait for the canary to timeout which can be a while.
> + Second ask is that when I pass the -t, that when it fails, it says what it
> failed against -- what region and hopefully what server location (might be
> hard).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
