[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13876024#comment-13876024 ]
Hudson commented on HBASE-10366: -------------------------------- FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.96 #263 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.96/263/]) HBASE-10366: 0.94 filterRow() may be skipped in 0.96(or onwards) code (jeffreyz: rev 1559551) * /hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java * /hbase/branches/0.96/hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/filter/TestFilter.java > 0.94 filterRow() may be skipped in 0.96(or onwards) code > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-10366 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10366 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Filters > Reporter: Jeffrey Zhong > Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.2 > > Attachments: hbase-10366-v1.patch, hbase-10366.patch > > > HBASE-6429 combines both filterRow & filterRow(List<KeyValue> kvs) functions > in Filter. > While 0.94 code or older, it may not implement hasFilterRow as HBase-6429 > expected because 0.94(old) hasFilterRow only returns true when > filterRow(List<KeyValue> kvs) is overridden not the filterRow(). Therefore, > the filterRow() will be skipped. > Since we don't ask 0.94 users to update their existing filter code, the issue > will cause scan returns unexpected keyvalues and break the backward > compatibility. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)