[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882151#comment-13882151
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10392:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12625234/HBASE-10392.3.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12625234

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8521//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Correct references to hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.upperLimit
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10392
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>            Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
>             Fix For: 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-10392.0.patch, HBASE-10392.1.patch, 
> HBASE-10392.2.patch, HBASE-10392.3.patch
>
>
> As part of the awesome new HBASE-5349, a couple references to 
> {{hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.upperLimit}} was missed. Clean those up 
> to use the new {{hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.size}} instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to