[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13889716#comment-13889716
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10455:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12626680/10455.v1.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12626680

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.1 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.token.TestZKSecretWatcher

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8576//console

This message is automatically generated.

> cleanup InterruptedException management
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10455
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10455
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client, master, regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.99.0
>            Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>            Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: 10455.v1.patch
>
>
> 4 changes in this code:
> 1) When caught and rethrowed as a IOException we always rethrow 
> InterruptedIOException
> 2) When we were both throwing an exception AND resetting the interrupt status 
> we only throw an exception now.
> 3) When we were trying to reset the status by Thread.interrupted() (which 
> does not do that), we now do it for real with a 
> Thread.currentThread.interrupt().
> 4) Sometimes, we were rethrowing something else then InterruptedIOException, 
> while the contract would have allowed it. I've changed this as well.
> This patch does not make means that we're fine when we're interrupted, but 
> we're globally cleaner at least. I will then create other patches specific to 
> some parts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to