[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13895337#comment-13895337
]
Feng Honghua commented on HBASE-9501:
-------------------------------------
bq.If you're ok with those changes I'll just apply them on commit, no need for
a new patch.
[~jdcryans]: Thanks for the review, I'm ok with those changes.
> Provide throttling for replication
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9501
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9501
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Replication
> Reporter: Feng Honghua
> Assignee: Feng Honghua
> Attachments: HBASE-9501-trunk_v0.patch, HBASE-9501-trunk_v1.patch,
> HBASE-9501-trunk_v2.patch, HBASE-9501-trunk_v3.patch
>
>
> When we disable a peer for a time of period, and then enable it, the
> ReplicationSource in master cluster will push the accumulated hlog entries
> during the disabled interval to the re-enabled peer cluster at full speed.
> If the bandwidth of the two clusters is shared by different applications, the
> push at full speed for replication can use all the bandwidth and severely
> influence other applications.
> Though there are two config replication.source.size.capacity and
> replication.source.nb.capacity to tweak the batch size each time a push
> delivers, but if decrease these two configs, the number of pushes increase,
> and all these pushes proceed continuously without pause. And no obvious help
> for the bandwidth throttling.
> From bandwidth-sharing and push-speed perspective, it's more reasonable to
> provide a bandwidth up limit for each peer push channel, and within that
> limit, peer can choose a big batch size for each push for bandwidth
> efficiency.
> Any opinion?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
