[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13955037#comment-13955037
 ] 

Hiroshi Ikeda commented on HBASE-6651:
--------------------------------------

Sorry
bq. the returnObject should return true only for the last borrower
true -> false

> Improve thread safety of HTablePool
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.1
>            Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
>            Assignee: Hiroshi Ikeda
>         Attachments: HBASE-6651-V10.patch, HBASE-6651-V11.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V12.patch, HBASE-6651-V13.patch, HBASE-6651-V14-0.96.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V14-0.98.patch, HBASE-6651-V14-trunk.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V15-0.96.patch, HBASE-6651-V15-0.98.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V15-trunk.patch, HBASE-6651-V16-0.96.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V16-0.98.patch, HBASE-6651-V16-trunk.patch, HBASE-6651-V2.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V3.patch, HBASE-6651-V4.patch, HBASE-6651-V5.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V6.patch, HBASE-6651-V7.patch, HBASE-6651-V8.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V9.patch, HBASE-6651.patch, sample.zip, sample.zip, 
> sharedmap_for_hbaseclient.zip
>
>
> There are some operations in HTablePool accessing PoolMap in multiple places 
> without any explicit synchronization. 
> For example HTablePool.closeTablePool() calls PoolMap.values(), and calls 
> PoolMap.remove(). If other threads add new instances to the pool in the 
> middle of the calls, the newly added instances might be dropped. 
> (HTablePool.closeTablePool() also has another problem that calling it by 
> multiple threads causes accessing HTable by multiple threads.)
> Moreover, PoolMap is not thread safe for the same reason.
> For example PoolMap.put() calles ConcurrentMap.get() and calles 
> ConcurrentMap.put(). If other threads add a new instance to the concurent map 
> in the middle of the calls, the new instance might be dropped.
> And also implementations of Pool have the same problems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to