[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13959596#comment-13959596
]
stack commented on HBASE-10866:
-------------------------------
I wonder if this is the right package for this:
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/consensus/SplitLogWorkerConsensus
Won't the master be participating? If so, the package should be in a relative
location they both can share: e.g. o.a.h.h.consensus rather than at
o.a.h.h.regionserver.consensus and o.a.h.h.master.consensus?
> Decouple HLogSplitterHandler from ZooKeeper
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10866
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10866
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: regionserver, Zookeeper
> Reporter: Mikhail Antonov
> Attachments: HBASE-10866.patch, HBASE-10866.patch, HBASE-10866.patch,
> HBASE-10866.patch, HBaseConsensus.pdf
>
>
> As some sort of follow-up or initial step towards HBASE-10296...
> Whatever consensus algorithm/library may be the chosen, perhaps on of first
> practical steps towards this goal would be to better abstract ZK-related API
> and details, which are now throughout the codebase (mostly leaked throuth
> ZkUtil, ZooKeeperWatcher and listeners).
> I'd like to propose a series of patches to help better abstract out zookeeper
> (and then help develop consensus APIs).
> Here is first version of patch for initial review (then I'm planning to work
> on another handlers in regionserver, and then perhaps start working on
> abstracting listeners).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
