[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
stack updated HBASE-11007: -------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.99.0 Affects Version/s: (was: 0.94.18) 0.94.19 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Making the patch for trunk. I could make a patch for 0.94 to backport the javadoc piece (since it already has a test, a test that is better than what I'm adding to trunk). You want it [~lhofhansl] > BLOCKCACHE in schema descriptor seems not aptly named > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-11007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11007 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.94.19 > Reporter: Varun Sharma > Assignee: Varun Sharma > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.99.0 > > Attachments: 11007.txt > > > Hi, > It seems that setting BLOCKCACHE key to false will disable the Data blocks > from being cached but will continue to cache bloom and index blocks. This > same property seems to be called cacheDataOnRead inside CacheConfig. > Should this be called CACHE_DATA_ON_READ instead of BLOCKCACHE similar to the > other CACHE_DATA_ON_WRITE/CACHE_INDEX_ON_WRITE. We got quite confused and > ended up adding our own property CACHE_DATA_ON_READ - we also added some unit > tests for the same. > What do folks think about this ? > Thanks > Varun -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)