[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14043016#comment-14043016
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-11039:
------------------------------------------------

Andy, I have a patch that works with ITBLL.  Lets check it internally once and 
if fine can try to push it in 0.98.4.

> [VisibilityController] Integration test for labeled data set mixing and 
> filtered excise
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11039
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11039
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Test
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.1
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.99.0, 0.98.5
>
>
> Create an integration test for the VisibilityController that:
> 1. Create several tables of test data
> 2. Assign a set of auths to each table. Label all entries in the table with 
> appropriate visibility expressions. Insure that some data in every table 
> overlaps with data in other tables at common row/family/qualifier 
> coordinates. Generate data like ITBLL so we can verify all data present later.
> 3. Mix the data from the different tables into a new common table
> 4. Verify for each set of auths defined in step #2 that all entries found in 
> the source table can be found in the common table. Like the ITBLL 
> verification step but done N times for each set of auths defined in step #2.
> 5. Choose one of the source tables. Get its set of auths. Perform a deletion 
> with visibility expression from the common table using those auths.
> 6. Verify that no data in the common table with the auth set chosen in #5 
> remains. A simple row count with the set of auths chosen in #5 that should 
> return 0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to