[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14085797#comment-14085797
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11667:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12659813/IntegrationTestBigLinkedListWithRegionMovement.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12659813

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.TestProcedureManager
                  org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.TestIPC
                  org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestClockSkewDetection

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10290//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Simplify ClientScanner logic for NSREs.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11667
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11667
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
>             Fix For: 0.99.0, 2.0.0, 0.94.23, 0.98.6
>
>         Attachments: 11667-0.94.txt, 11667-trunk.txt, HBASE-11667-0.98.patch, 
> IntegrationTestBigLinkedListWithRegionMovement.patch
>
>
> We ran into an issue with Phoenix where a RegionObserver coprocessor 
> intercepts a scan and returns an aggregate (in this case a count) with a fake 
> row key. It turns out this does not work when the {{ClientScanner}} 
> encounters NSREs, as it uses the last key it saw to reset the scanner to try 
> again (which in this case would be the fake key).
> While this is arguably a rare case and one could also argue that a region 
> observer just shouldn't do this... While looking at {{ClientScanner}}'s code 
> I found this logic not necessary.
> A NSRE occurred because we contacted a region server with a key that it no 
> longer hosts. This is the start key, so it is always correct to retry with 
> this same key. That simplifies the ClientScanner logic and also make this 
> sort of coprocessors possible,



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to