[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14099283#comment-14099283
 ] 

Francis Liu commented on HBASE-11165:
-------------------------------------

{quote}
I haven't read the full discussion, so sorry if I missed this piece.
does splitting meta means having multiple master each one handing its own meta 
and its own set of RS?
{quote}
It does not have to be. So far we can see there are gains to be made in 
scalability by spliting meta so that it is served by multiple RS. We will do 
the work to motivate multi-master and justify the complexity if need be.

{quote}
otherwise we go back as before, the idea of having meta colocated with the 
master was have operation like assignment, or disable/enable, create/delete 
interact with "local data" and avoid complexity in handling failure when 
interacting with other machines.
{quote}
I don't see why collocation is required to have the features you mentioned. 
IMHO all you need is the mutations/locking/etc to be centrally managed (ie all 
updates to meta is sent to the master), the meta itself can be anywhere. So I'd 
argue that central management is needed, collocation is not required. Please 
correct me if I'm missing something here.


> Scaling so cluster can host 1M regions and beyond (50M regions?)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11165
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11165
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>            Reporter: stack
>         Attachments: HBASE-11165.zip, Region Scalability test.pdf, 
> zk_less_assignment_comparison.pdf, zk_less_assignment_comparison_2.pdf
>
>
> This discussion issue comes out of "Co-locate Meta And Master HBASE-10569" 
> and comments on the doc posted there.
> A user -- our Francis Liu -- needs to be able to scale a cluster to do 1M 
> regions maybe even 50M later.  This issue is about discussing how we will do 
> that (or if not 50M on a cluster, how otherwise we can attain same end).
> More detail to follow.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to