[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14101717#comment-14101717
]
Francis Liu commented on HBASE-11165:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
Do we need to split this conversation into what to do on master and what to do
with 0.98? We could for example file two separate subtasks that approach the
meta scaling problem in different ways for the respective branches. They are
divergent enough so that would be a good idea IMHO>
{quote}
It sounds to me like we've at least come to an agreement that splitting META is
reasonable. Off-hand any implementation in trunk should be backportable 0.98.
The parallel discussion was about multi-master and the merits of collocation
which can be a separate issue. Correct me if I'm wrong [~mbertozzi] and
[~jxiang].
> Scaling so cluster can host 1M regions and beyond (50M regions?)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11165
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11165
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Reporter: stack
> Attachments: HBASE-11165.zip, Region Scalability test.pdf,
> zk_less_assignment_comparison_2.pdf
>
>
> This discussion issue comes out of "Co-locate Meta And Master HBASE-10569"
> and comments on the doc posted there.
> A user -- our Francis Liu -- needs to be able to scale a cluster to do 1M
> regions maybe even 50M later. This issue is about discussing how we will do
> that (or if not 50M on a cluster, how otherwise we can attain same end).
> More detail to follow.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
