[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14109229#comment-14109229
]
Nicolas Liochon edited comment on HBASE-11610 at 8/25/14 3:52 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
bq. threadLocal HTable ), it is ~5% slower
Ah, ok. It's a little bit strange actually. But not big enough to delay the
patch.
bq. done with 10 HConnections
I see. Then let's keep it.
bq. will use the single pool managed by MultiHConnection
I haven't checked in the code, but it seems you're right.
bq. how about hbase.multihconnection.threads.max as the pool is part of
MultiHconnection?
No strong opinion. As you like for me.
+1 for the patch, as the remaining is pure nit.
was (Author: nkeywal):
bq. threadLocal HTable ), it is ~5% slower
Ah, ok. It's a little bit strange actually. But not big enough to delay the
patch.
bq. done with 10 HConnections
I see. Then let's keep it.
bq. will use the single pool managed by MultiHConnection
I haven't checked in the code, but it seems you're right.
bq. how about hbase.multihconnection.threads.max as the pool is part of
MultiHconnection?
No strong opinion. As you like for me.
+1 for the patch, as the remaining it pure nit.
> Enhance remote meta updates
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Jimmy Xiang
> Assignee: Virag Kothari
> Attachments: HBASE-11610.patch, HBASE-11610_2.patch,
> HBASE-11610_v3.patch
>
>
> Currently, if the meta region is on a regionserver instead of the master,
> meta update is synchronized on one HTable instance. We should be able to do
> better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
