[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130402#comment-14130402
 ] 

Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-11906:
---------------------------------------

{quote}
Another option is to put it ZK for now, and move them together later when you 
are ready.
{quote}
Actually that's what I'm thinking too. There are some ideas that we can move 
the recovery state out of ZK. But we can do it once later. I'll post a revised 
patch soon. Thanks.

> Meta data loss with distributed log replay
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11906
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.99.0, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jimmy Xiang
>            Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong
>         Attachments: HBASE-11906.patch, debugging.patch, 
> meta-data-loss-2.log, meta-data-loss-with-dlr.log
>
>
> In the attached log, you can see, before log replaying, the region is open on 
> e1205:
> {noformat}
> A3. 2014-09-05 16:38:46,705 INFO  
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=5,queue=2,port=20020] master.RegionStateStore: 
> Updating row 
> IntegrationTestBigLinkedList,\x90Jy\x04\xA7\x90Jp,1409959495482.cbb0d736ebfabcf4a07e5a7b395fcdf7.
>  with 
> state=OPEN&openSeqNum=40118237&server=e1205.halxg.cloudera.com,20020,1409960280431
> {noformat}
> After the log replay, we got from meta the region is open on e1209
> {noformat}
> A4. 2014-09-05 16:41:12,257 INFO  [ActiveMasterManager] 
> master.AssignmentManager: Loading from meta: 
> {cbb0d736ebfabcf4a07e5a7b395fcdf7 state=OPEN, ts=1409960472257, 
> server=e1209.halxg.cloudera.com,20020,1409959391651}
> {noformat}
> The replayed edits show the log does have the edit expected:
> {noformat}
> 2014-09-05 16:41:11,862 INFO  
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=18,queue=0,port=20020] 
> regionserver.RSRpcServices: Meta replay edit 
> type=PUT,mutation={"totalColumns":4,"families":{"info":[{"timestamp":1409960326705,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x02bad"],"value":"e1205.halxg.cloudera.com:20020","qualifier":"server","vlen":30},{"timestamp":1409960326705,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x02bad"],"value":"\\x00\\x00\\x01HH.\\x81o","qualifier":"serverstartcode","vlen":8},{"timestamp":1409960326705,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x02bad"],"value":"\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x02d'\\xDD","qualifier":"seqnumDuringOpen","vlen":8},{"timestamp":1409960326706,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x02bad"],"value":"OPEN","qualifier":"state","vlen":4}]},"row":"IntegrationTestBigLinkedList,\\x90Jy\\x04\\xA7\\x90Jp,1409959495482.cbb0d736ebfabcf4a07e5a7b395fcdf7."}
> {noformat}
> Why we picked up a wrong value with an older time stamp?
> {noformat}
> 2014-09-05 16:41:11,063 INFO  
> [B.defaultRpcServer.handler=9,queue=0,port=20020] regionserver.RSRpcServices: 
> Meta replay edit 
> type=PUT,mutation={"totalColumns":4,"families":{"info":[{"timestamp":1409959994634,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x09\\x99"],"value":"e1209.halxg.cloudera.com:20020","qualifier":"server","vlen":30},{"timestamp":1409959994634,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x09\\x99"],"value":"\\x00\\x00\\x01HH
>  
> \\xF1\\xA3","qualifier":"serverstartcode","vlen":8},{"timestamp":1409959994634,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x09\\x99"],"value":"\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x01\\xB7\\xAB","qualifier":"seqnumDuringOpen","vlen":8},{"timestamp":1409959994634,"tag":["3:\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x09\\x99"],"value":"OPEN","qualifier":"state","vlen":4}]},"row":"IntegrationTestBigLinkedList,\\x90Jy\\x04\\xA7\\x90Jp,1409959495482.cbb0d736ebfabcf4a07e5a7b395fcdf7."}
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to