[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14165676#comment-14165676
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-11990:
--------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #5640 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/5640/])
HBASE-11990 Make setting the start and stop row for a specific prefix easier
(Niels Basjes) (stack: rev 0eb0721fef8723640b5c3b911b06f0d066d4b55f)
*
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/filter/TestScanRowPrefix.java
*
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/filter/TestFilterWithScanLimits.java
*
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/filter/FilterTestingCluster.java
* hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/Scan.java
* src/main/docbkx/book.xml
> Make setting the start and stop row for a specific prefix easier
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11990
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11990
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Client
> Reporter: Niels Basjes
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.99.1
>
> Attachments: 11990v4.txt, HBASE-11990-20140916-v2.patch,
> HBASE-11990-20140916-v3.patch, HBASE-11990-20140916-v5.patch,
> HBASE-11990-20140916-v6.patch, HBASE-11990-20140916.patch,
> HBASE-11990-20140917-v7.patch, HBASE-11990-20140919-v8.patch,
> HBASE-11990-20140921-v9.patch, HBASE-11990-20140923-v10.patch,
> HBASE-11990-20140923-v10.patch, HBASE-11990-20141009-v11.patch
>
>
> If you want to set a scan from your application to scan for a specific row
> prefix this is actually quite hard.
> As described in several places you can set the startRow to the prefix; yet
> the stopRow should be set to the prefix '+1'
> If the prefix 'ASCII' put into a byte[] then this is easy because you can
> simply increment the last byte of the array.
> But if your application uses real binary rowids you may run into the scenario
> that your prefix is something like
> {code}{ 0x12, 0x23, 0xFF, 0xFF }{code} Then the increment should be {code}{
> 0x12, 0x24 }{code}
> I have prepared a proposed patch that makes setting these values correctly a
> lot easier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
