[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14168514#comment-14168514
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-12128:
---------------------------------------

This should be relatively easy for the new style of Table creation. As 
suggested we can make a TableConfiguration object and instantiate once in 
Connection. All HTable's will get this in ctor. 

> Cache configuration and RpcController selection for Table in Connection
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12128
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12128
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.8, 0.99.2
>
>
> Creating Table instances should be lightweight. Apps that manage their own 
> Connections are expected to create Tables on demand for each interaction. 
> However we look up values from Hadoop Configuration when constructing Table 
> objects for storing to some of its fields. Configuration is a heavyweight 
> registry that does a lot of string operations and regex matching. Method 
> calls into Configuration account for 48.25% of CPU time when creating the 
> HTable object in 0.98. Another ~48% of CPU is spent constructing the desired 
> RpcController object via reflection in 0.98. Together this can account for 
> ~20% of total on-CPU time of the client. See parent issue for more detail.
> We are using Connection like a factory for Table. We should cache 
> configuration for Table in Connection. We should also create by reflection 
> once and cache the desired RpcController object, and clone it for new Tables.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to