[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14243672#comment-14243672
 ] 

Stephen Yuan Jiang commented on HBASE-12071:
--------------------------------------------

[~apurtell]  currently we have 3 RpcExecutor for different request types:
- priorityExecutor for meta table request and some admin requests
- replicationExecutor for replication requests 
- callExecutor for normal requests.  

Each executor used different thread pools.  This should be enough to address 
[~skadambi]'s concern.  

I went through the Admin.proto and could add more admin requests (master <-> 
region server communication) to use priorityExecutor.  

> Separate out thread pool for Master <-> RegionServer communication
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12071
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12071
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sudarshan Kadambi
>            Assignee: Stephen Yuan Jiang
>
> Over in HBASE-12028, there is a discussion about the case of a RegionServer 
> still being alive despite all its handler threads being dead. One outcome of 
> this is that the Master is left hanging on the RS for completion of various 
> operations - such as region un-assignment when a table is disabled. Does it 
> make sense to create a separate thread pool for communication between the 
> Master and the RS? This addresses not just the case of the RPC handler 
> threads terminating but also long-running queries or co-processor executions 
> holding up master operations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to