[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14243672#comment-14243672 ]
Stephen Yuan Jiang commented on HBASE-12071: -------------------------------------------- [~apurtell] currently we have 3 RpcExecutor for different request types: - priorityExecutor for meta table request and some admin requests - replicationExecutor for replication requests - callExecutor for normal requests. Each executor used different thread pools. This should be enough to address [~skadambi]'s concern. I went through the Admin.proto and could add more admin requests (master <-> region server communication) to use priorityExecutor. > Separate out thread pool for Master <-> RegionServer communication > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-12071 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12071 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sudarshan Kadambi > Assignee: Stephen Yuan Jiang > > Over in HBASE-12028, there is a discussion about the case of a RegionServer > still being alive despite all its handler threads being dead. One outcome of > this is that the Master is left hanging on the RS for completion of various > operations - such as region un-assignment when a table is disabled. Does it > make sense to create a separate thread pool for communication between the > Master and the RS? This addresses not just the case of the RPC handler > threads terminating but also long-running queries or co-processor executions > holding up master operations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)