[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14246385#comment-14246385
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-10201:
-------------------------------

I'm +1 on this going into master branch.  I am +1 on this going into branch-1 
but with it disabled by default as an experimental feature; users would have to 
enable the FlushLargeStoresPolicy explicitly (You ok w/ that [~enis])?

Any chance of more +1s?  [~jeffreyz]? Any other reviews out there? This is an 
old issue, nicely addressed, that can make a nice dent in our i/o profile when 
more than one column family but it would be good to get more eyes on it given 
its messing with sequenceids. Thanks.

> Port 'Make flush decisions per column family' to trunk
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10201
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10201
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wal
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: zhangduo
>             Fix For: 1.0.0, 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: 3149-trunk-v1.txt, HBASE-10201-0.98.patch, 
> HBASE-10201-0.98_1.patch, HBASE-10201-0.98_2.patch, HBASE-10201-0.99.patch, 
> HBASE-10201.patch, HBASE-10201_1.patch, HBASE-10201_10.patch, 
> HBASE-10201_11.patch, HBASE-10201_12.patch, HBASE-10201_13.patch, 
> HBASE-10201_13.patch, HBASE-10201_14.patch, HBASE-10201_15.patch, 
> HBASE-10201_16.patch, HBASE-10201_17.patch, HBASE-10201_18.patch, 
> HBASE-10201_19.patch, HBASE-10201_2.patch, HBASE-10201_3.patch, 
> HBASE-10201_4.patch, HBASE-10201_5.patch, HBASE-10201_6.patch, 
> HBASE-10201_7.patch, HBASE-10201_8.patch, HBASE-10201_9.patch, 
> compactions.png, count.png, io.png, memstore.png
>
>
> Currently the flush decision is made using the aggregate size of all column 
> families. When large and small column families co-exist, this causes many 
> small flushes of the smaller CF. We need to make per-CF flush decisions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to