[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14329933#comment-14329933
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-11842:
---------------------------------------

bq. Second line above has 'hbase.' prefix. Should it be consistent with the 
style of the other options ?
The usage of "hbase" prefix is coming from the base class. We should have 
standardized it, but unfortunately we did not. We can fix it in another patch. 
bq. Why factor of 0.9 is used above ?
0.9 is used since the run time is just a soft bound on how long the test should 
run. It is iterative, so expectation is that it will not iterate more if it is 
around %90 done. 

> Integration test for async wal replication to secondary regions
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11842
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11842
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-11842_v1.patch, hbase-11842_v2.patch
>
>
> We should add an integration test to cover async wal replication to secondary 
> regions. 
> Async wal replication to region replicas has been committed (HBASE-11568) and 
> flush /compaction handling (HBASE-11569) and failover handling for secondary 
> region replicas (HBASE-11580) is in the works.  
> The test can use LoadTestTool over a table with region replicas. We can write 
> to the primary regions, and read from the secondary region replicas in reader 
> threads to do the verification. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to