[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14364019#comment-14364019
 ] 

Andrey Stepachev commented on HBASE-13254:
------------------------------------------

[~syuanjiang] thanks for raising that. I think we can remove this code along 
with skipTableStateCheck field. It should be needed anymore (there is no reason 
to think that table without state still can be enabled, there is many code 
around that ensures that state is always in meta).

> EnableTableHandler#prepare would not throw TableNotFoundException during 
> recovery
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13254
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13254
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Stephen Yuan Jiang
>            Assignee: Stephen Yuan Jiang
>            Priority: Minor
>
> During recovery, when EnableTableHandler#prepare() is called, If the table 
> does not exist, it marks the table as deleted and does NOT throw 
> TableNotFoundException.  The result is that the table lock is released and 
> the caller has no knowledge that the table not exist or already deleted, it 
> would continue the next step.
> {code}
>   public EnableTableHandler prepare()
>       throws TableNotFoundException, TableNotDisabledException, IOException {
>    ...
>     try {
>       // Check if table exists
>       if (!MetaTableAccessor.tableExists(this.server.getConnection(), 
> tableName)) {
>         // retainAssignment is true only during recovery.  In normal case it 
> is false
>         if (!this.skipTableStateCheck) {
>           throw new TableNotFoundException(tableName);
>         }
>          
> this.assignmentManager.getTableStateManager().setDeletedTable(tableName);
>       }
>    ...
>   }
> {code}
> However,look at the recovery code that calls the EnableTableHandler#prepare 
> function, AssignmentManager#recoverTableInEnablingState() expects 
> TableNotFoundException so that it can skip the table.
> {code}
>   private void recoverTableInEnablingState()
>           throws KeeperException, IOException {
>     Set<TableName> enablingTables = tableStateManager.
>             getTablesInStates(TableState.State.ENABLING);
>     if (enablingTables.size() != 0) {
>       for (TableName tableName : enablingTables) {
>         // Recover by calling EnableTableHandler
>         LOG.info("The table " + tableName
>             + " is in ENABLING state.  Hence recovering by moving the table"
>             + " to ENABLED state.");
>         // enableTable in sync way during master startup,
>         // no need to invoke coprocessor
>         EnableTableHandler eth = new EnableTableHandler(this.server, 
> tableName,
>           this, tableLockManager, true);
>         try {
>           eth.prepare();
>         } catch (TableNotFoundException e) {
>           LOG.warn("Table " + tableName + " not found in hbase:meta to 
> recover.");
>           continue;
>         }
>         eth.process();
>       }
>     }
>   }
> {code}
> The proposed fix is always throw TableNotFoundException in 
> EnableTableHandler#prepare if the table does not exist.
> note: this bug only applies to master, a regression from HBASE-7767.  
> Branch-1 has the correct logic, after setting table state, it would throw the 
> exception.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to