[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14376961#comment-14376961
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-11544:
----------------------------------------

bq.  Avoid things like heapSize 

For this, I think we're stuck waiting for 2.0.


> [Ergonomics] hbase.client.scanner.caching is dogged and will try to return 
> batch even if it means OOME
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11544
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11544
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: Jonathan Lawlor
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-11544-branch_1_0-v1.patch, 
> HBASE-11544-branch_1_0-v2.patch, HBASE-11544-v1.patch, HBASE-11544-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-11544-v3.patch, HBASE-11544-v4.patch, HBASE-11544-v5.patch, 
> HBASE-11544-v6.patch, HBASE-11544-v6.patch, HBASE-11544-v6.patch, 
> HBASE-11544-v7.patch, HBASE-11544-v8-branch-1.patch, HBASE-11544-v8.patch, 
> gc.j.png, hits.j.png, mean.png, net.j.png
>
>
> Running some tests, I set hbase.client.scanner.caching=1000.  Dataset has 
> large cells.  I kept OOME'ing.
> Serverside, we should measure how much we've accumulated and return to the 
> client whatever we've gathered once we pass out a certain size threshold 
> rather than keep accumulating till we OOME.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to