[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Srikanth Srungarapu updated HBASE-13294:
----------------------------------------
    Attachment: HBASE-13294-branch-1.patch

Fixing the line length warnings for branch-1 patch. Didn't find any relevant 
findbugs warnings though.

> Fix the critical ancient loopholes in security testing infrastructure.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13294
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13294
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Srikanth Srungarapu
>            Assignee: Srikanth Srungarapu
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 0.98.12
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13294-0.98.patch, HBASE-13294-0.98.patch, 
> HBASE-13294-branch-1.0.pach, HBASE-13294-branch-1.patch, 
> HBASE-13294-branch-1.patch, HBASE-13294.patch, HBASE-13294_v2.patch, 
> HBASE-13294_v3.patch, HBASE-13294_v3.patch, HBASE-13294_v4.patch, 
> HBASE-13294_v5.patch, HBASE-13294_v6.patch, HBASE-13294_v6.patch
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "verifyDenied" method doesn't fail when action parameter 
> returns null. The relevant code snippet
> {code}
> try {
>         Object obj = user.runAs(action);
>         if (requireException) {
>           fail("Expected exception was not thrown for user '" + 
> user.getShortName() + "'");
>         }
>         if (obj != null && obj instanceof List<?>) {
>           List<?> results = (List<?>) obj;
>           if (results != null && !results.isEmpty()) {
>             fail("Unexpected results for user '" + user.getShortName() + "'");
>           }
>         }
>       }
> {code}
> As you can see, when obj is null, it returns silently. 
> Fixing this issue has uncovered another major bug. While constructing 
> actions, we're using TEST_UTIL.getConnection(), which replaces the "doAs" 
> user with the user who initiated the connection. I really am grateful to 
> [~mbertozzi] without whom debugging this would have been a nightmare. 
> Now, fixing these two issues have uncovered more issues in our tests :). The 
> main one is we're allowing the table owner to truncate table in code. But, in 
> test, we're not allowing him. We should either remove the code that allows 
> owner or document that the table owner can truncate table.
> The other minor issues include granting permissions to namespace, but 
> checking whether user was able to access tables inside other namespace.  
> That's it, folks! 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to