[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14393479#comment-14393479
]
Dave Latham commented on HBASE-12891:
-------------------------------------
I see it has been closed. [~apurtell] Are you saying given the problems that
you personally don't want to be committing it, that you don't want to see it
continue on this JIRA (and another should be filed), or that as RM you don't
want this in branch 0.98 at all?
> Parallel execution for Hbck checkRegionConsistency
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12891
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12891
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hbck
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 0.98.10, 1.1.0
> Reporter: churro morales
> Assignee: Dave Latham
> Labels: performance, scalability
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-12891-v1.patch, HBASE-12891-v3.patch,
> HBASE-12891-v4-0.98.patch, HBASE-12891-v4-branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-12891-v4.1-0.98.patch, HBASE-12891-v4.patch, HBASE-12891.98.patch,
> HBASE-12891.patch, HBASE-12891.patch, HBASE-12891.v2-branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-12891.v2-master.patch, hbase-12891-addendum1.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of regions on our cluster ~500k and noticed that hbck took
> quite some time in checkAndFixConsistency(). [~davelatham] patched our
> cluster to do this check in parallel to speed things up. I'll attach the
> patch.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
