[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14490622#comment-14490622
 ] 

Marcelo Vanzin commented on HBASE-6393:
---------------------------------------

FYI, even though I had a patch for this originally and asked Matteo to hold off 
til I had a chance to update it, currently I'm probably not gonna spend time on 
that. (Internally I think we worked around this in a different manner, so 
adding this patch would probably not add much value to us at this point anyway.)

So feel free to do as you wish here. :-)

> Decouple audit event creation from storage in AccessController
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6393
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.2
>            Reporter: Marcelo Vanzin
>         Attachments: HBASE-6393-v2.patch, HBASE-6393-v3.patch, 
> hbase-6393-v1.patch
>
>
> Currently, AccessControler takes care of both generating audit events (by 
> performing access checks) and storing them (by creating a log message and 
> writing it to the AUDITLOG logger).
> This makes the logging system the only way to catch audit events. It means 
> that if someone wants to do something fancier (like writing these records to 
> a database somewhere), they need to hack through the logging system, and 
> parse the messages generated by AccessController, which is not optimal.
> The attached patch decouples generation and storage by introducing a new 
> interface, used by AccessController, to log the audit events. The current, 
> log-based storage is kept in place so that current users won't be affected by 
> the change.
> I'm filing this as an RFC at this point, so the patch is not totally clean; 
> it's on top of HBase 0.92 (which is easier for me to test) and doesn't have 
> any unit tests, for starters. But the changes should be very similar on trunk 
> - I don't remember changes in this particular area of the code between those 
> versions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to