[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14539992#comment-14539992 ]
stack commented on HBASE-13448: ------------------------------- Is there too much machinery involved to run a jmh micro-benchmark on cache vs non-caching of row offset, row length (and whatever you think we should cache)? Numbers are pretty crazy [~anoop.hbase] You going to do more compares? Adding explicit tracker and pure get of a single cell? Nice work. > New Cell implementation with cached component offsets/lengths > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-13448 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13448 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Scanners > Reporter: Anoop Sam John > Assignee: Anoop Sam John > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-13448.patch, HBASE-13448_V2.patch, gc.png, hits.png > > > This can be extension to KeyValue and can be instantiated and used in read > path. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)