[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14551803#comment-14551803
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-13375:
------------------------------------

LGTM (non-binding), I'd say. One nit jumped out at me

{code}
+  public boolean isSuperUser()
+    throws IOException {
+    if (superUsers == null || superGroups == null) {
+      throw new IOException("Super users/super groups lists haven't been 
initialized properly,");
+    }
{code}

We're not doing any IO here, so an IOException is a little weird to throw. Not 
a huge issue (given how often IOException gets misused anyways).

> Provide HBase superuser higher priority over other users in the RPC handling
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13375
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13375
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: rpc
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Mikhail Antonov
>             Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13375-v0.patch, HBASE-13375-v1.patch, 
> HBASE-13375-v1.patch, HBASE-13375-v1.patch, HBASE-13375-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-13375-v3.patch, HBASE-13375-v4.patch, HBASE-13375-v5.patch, 
> HBASE-13375-v6.patch, HBASE-13375-v7.patch
>
>
> HBASE-13351 annotates Master RPCs so that RegionServer RPCs are treated with 
> a higher priority compared to user RPCs (and they are handled by a separate 
> set of handlers, etc.). It may be good to stretch this to users too - hbase 
> superuser (configured via hbase.superuser) gets higher priority over other 
> users in the RPC handling. That way the superuser can always perform 
> administrative operations on the cluster even if all the normal priority 
> handlers are occupied (for example, we had a situation where all the master's 
> handlers were tied up with many simultaneous createTable RPC calls from 
> multiple users and the master wasn't able to perform any operations initiated 
> by the admin). (Discussed this some with [~enis] and [~elserj]).
> Does this make sense to others?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to