[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14575377#comment-14575377 ]
stack commented on HBASE-13811: ------------------------------- Updated rb. Looking for a +1. Running on cluster. So far so good but sometimes takes a few runs for issue to show. Will report back. > Splitting WALs, we are filtering out too many edits -> DATALOSS > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-13811 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13811 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: wal > Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.2.0 > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0 > > Attachments: 13811.branch-1.txt, 13811.branch-1.txt, 13811.txt, > 13811.v2.branch-1.txt, 13811.v3.branch-1.txt, 13811.v3.branch-1.txt, > 13811.v4.branch-1.txt, 13811.v5.branch-1.txt, 13811.v6.branch-1.txt, > 13811.v6.branch-1.txt, 13811.v7.branch-1.txt, 13811.v8.branch-1.txt, > 13811.v9.branch-1.txt, HBASE-13811-v1.testcase.patch, > HBASE-13811.testcase.patch, startCacheFlush.diff > > > I've been running ITBLLs against branch-1 around HBASE-13616 (move of > ServerShutdownHandler to pv2). I have come across an instance of dataloss. My > patch for HBASE-13616 was in place so can only think it the cause (but cannot > see how). When we split the logs, we are skipping legit edits. Digging. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)