[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14593350#comment-14593350
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-13939:
----------------------------------------

>getFirstKeyInBlock() 
We need rename this then? When it says key returning BB or byte[] makes more 
sense? 

> Make HFileReaderImpl.getFirstKeyInBlock() to return a Cell
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13939
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13939.patch, HBASE-13939_1.patch
>
>
> The getFirstKeyInBlock() in HFileReaderImpl is returning a BB. It is getting 
> used in seekBefore cases.  Because we return a BB we create a KeyOnlyKV once 
> for comparison
> {code}
>       if (reader.getComparator()
>           .compareKeyIgnoresMvcc(
>               new KeyValue.KeyOnlyKeyValue(firstKey.array(), 
> firstKey.arrayOffset(),
>                   firstKey.limit()), key) >= 0) {
>         long previousBlockOffset = seekToBlock.getPrevBlockOffset();
>         // The key we are interested in
>         if (previousBlockOffset == -1) {
>           // we have a 'problem', the key we want is the first of the file.
>           return false;
>         }
> ........
> {code}
> And if the compare fails we again create another KeyOnlyKv 
> {code}
>       Cell firstKeyInCurrentBlock = new 
> KeyValue.KeyOnlyKeyValue(Bytes.getBytes(firstKey));
>       loadBlockAndSeekToKey(seekToBlock, firstKeyInCurrentBlock, true, key, 
> true);
> {code}
> So one object will be enough and that can be returned by getFirstKeyInBlock. 
> Also will be useful when we go with Buffered backed server cell to change in 
> one place. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to