[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14971984#comment-14971984
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-14580:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.3-IT #265 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3-IT/265/])
HBASE-14580 Make the HBaseMiniCluster compliant with Kerberos (apurtell: rev 
cdf2c01a76767aa221738b1c9cc1036aed9a6113)
* hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HBaseTestingUtility.java


> Make the HBaseMiniCluster compliant with Kerberos
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14580
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14580
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security, test
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>            Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.2.1, 0.98.16
>
>         Attachments: hbase-14580.v2.patch, hbase-14580.v2.patch, 
> patch-14580.v1.patch
>
>
> Whne using MiniKDC and the minicluster in a unit test, there is a conflict 
> causeed by HBaseTestingUtility:
> {code}
>   public static User getDifferentUser(final Configuration c,
>     final String differentiatingSuffix)
>   throws IOException {
>    // snip
>     String username = User.getCurrent().getName() +
>       differentiatingSuffix; <==================== problem here
>     User user = User.createUserForTesting(c, username,
>         new String[]{"supergroup"});
>     return user;
>   }
> {code}
> This creates users like securedUser/localh...@example.com.hfs.0, and this 
> does not work.
> My fix is to return the current user when Kerberos is set. I don't think that 
> there is another option (any other opinion?). However this user is not in a 
> group so we have logs like 'WARN  [IPC Server handler 9 on 61366] 
> security.UserGroupInformation (UserGroupInformation.java:getGroupNames(1521)) 
> - No groups available for user securedUser' I'm not sure of its impact. 
> [~apurtell], what do you think?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to