[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14979315#comment-14979315
 ] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-14700:
----------------------------------------

bq. Hmm, I originally thought that we could get this same info from the audit 
log, but, looking now, the audit log entry is written in saslReadAndProcess(), 
so it would never be called for these fallback authentications. I can defer the 
logging until after the connection header is read so that we can log the 
username as well. Agree that that is critical information. Seems like we would 
want these present in the audit log as well, with SIMPLE for the auth method?

Yes

bq. I suppose if the negotiation fails, then if the server-side fallback flag 
in enabled, we could add a check to send the SWITCH_TO_SIMPLE_AUTH response. 
That could allow things to continue working in an insecure manner, but could 
also mask client-side misconfigurations. If you still think it's worthwhile, 
maybe we should open a separate JIRA to discuss implications?

Sure, worth following up on separately

> Support a "permissive" mode for secure clusters to allow "simple" auth clients
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14700
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14700
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Gary Helmling
>            Assignee: Gary Helmling
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-14700-v2.patch, HBASE-14700.patch
>
>
> When implementing HBase security for an existing cluster, it can be useful to 
> support mixed secure and insecure clients while all client configurations are 
> migrated over to secure authentication.  
> We currently have an option to allow secure clients to fallback to simple 
> auth against insecure clusters.  By providing an analogous setting for 
> servers, we would allow a phased rollout of security:
> # First, security can be enabled on the cluster servers, with the 
> "permissive" mode enabled
> # Clients can be converting to using secure authentication incrementally
> # The server audit logs allow identification of clients still using simple 
> auth to connect
> # Finally, when sufficient clients have been converted to secure operation, 
> the server-side "permissive" mode can be removed, allowing completely secure 
> operation.
> Obviously with this enabled, there is no effective access control, but this 
> would still be a useful tool to enable a smooth operational rollout of 
> security.  Permissive mode would of course be disabled by default.  Enabling 
> it should provide a big scary warning in the logs on startup, and possibly be 
> flagged on relevant UIs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to