[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15047929#comment-15047929
 ] 

Heng Chen commented on HBASE-14004:
-----------------------------------

{quote}
Have to be careful how we do this. We have elaborate accounting now that allows 
only one 'sync' type, either a hflush or a hsync, but not a mix of both.
{quote}
After read notes in doc, i begin to agree with stack.   
Why we need hsync?  The concern about using 'hflush' is we may lost data when 3 
DNs and RS crash at the same time, right?  It is really small probability. But 
if we introduce hsync (for example hsync periodically), it will cause latency 
between master and slave. Is it worth to do it? 

And inconsistency problem about this issue in replication could be fixed if 
replicator only read entries 'acked hflushed' just like we do in recovery 
process when hflush failed, right? And as our design,  we only use hsync to 
ensure  data inconsistency in replication but data lost still happen because we 
NOT use 'hsync' in write path. If so, why NOT we just use hflush?  

> [Replication] Inconsistency between Memstore and WAL may result in data in 
> remote cluster that is not in the origin
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14004
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14004
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: He Liangliang
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: replication, wal
>
> Looks like the current write path can cause inconsistency between 
> memstore/hfile and WAL which cause the slave cluster has more data than the 
> master cluster.
> The simplified write path looks like:
> 1. insert record into Memstore
> 2. write record to WAL
> 3. sync WAL
> 4. rollback Memstore if 3 fails
> It's possible that the HDFS sync RPC call fails, but the data is already  
> (may partially) transported to the DNs which finally get persisted. As a 
> result, the handler will rollback the Memstore and the later flushed HFile 
> will also skip this record.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to