[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15125890#comment-15125890
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15158:
--------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-Trunk_matrix #672 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/672/])
HBASE-15158 HBASE-15158 Preamble 1 of 2: fix findbugs, add javadoc, (stack: rev 
2cc48e039d1f800832ac8880bbc820982e0ac8a5)
* 
hbase-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/example/ZooKeeperScanPolicyObserver.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/wal/FSWALEntry.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/CellUtil.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/AssignmentManager.java
* 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestCoprocessorScanPolicy.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/StoreScanner.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/ipc/RpcServer.java
* 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/NoOpScanPolicyObserver.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/CellCounter.java
* hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/Scan.java
* 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/DefaultMemStore.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HStore.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/hfile/HFileBlockIndex.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RowProcessor.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/hfile/HFileReaderImpl.java
* 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsckOneRS.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/RegionSplitter.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/wal/FSHLog.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/KeyValueScanner.java
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/Region.java
* hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TagUtil.java


> Change order in which we do write pipeline operations; do all under row locks!
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15158
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15158
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Performance
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: 15158.patch, 15158v2.patch
>
>
> Change how we do our write pipeline. I want to do all write pipeline ops 
> under row lock so I lean on this fact fixing performance regression in 
> check-and-set type operations like increment, append, and checkAnd* (see 
> sibling issue HBASE-15082).
> To be specific, we write like this now:
> {code}
> # take rowlock
> # start mvcc
> # append to WAL
> # add to memstore
> # let go of rowlock
> # sync WAL
> # in case of error: rollback memstore
> {code}
> Instead, write like this:
> {code}
> # take rowlock
> # start mvcc
> # append to WAL
> # sync WAL
> # add to memstore
> # let go of rowlock
> ... no need to do rollback.
> {code}
> The old ordering was put in place because it got better performance in a time 
> when WAL was different and before row locks were read/write (HBASE-12751).
> Testing in branch-1 shows that a reordering and skipping mvcc waits gets us 
> back to the performance we had before we unified mvcc and sequenceid 
> (HBASE-8763). Tests in HBASE-15046 show that at the macro level using our 
> usual perf tools, reordering pipeline seems to cause no slowdown (see 
> HBASE-15046). A rough compare of increments with reordered write pipeline 
> seems to have us getting back a bunch of our performance (see tail of 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15082?focusedCommentId=15111703&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15111703
>  and subsequent comment).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to