[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15129187#comment-15129187
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-15177:
-------------------------------------

bq.  We do not have to depend on a released version.

I do not believe this is true, and would rather not get into it with ASF policy 
folks on the distinction between non-ASF folks who are not a part of the Yetus 
development community vs ASF folks who are not a part of the Yetus development 
community.

Yetus is blocked on their 0.2.0 release on me making a guide for the next 
release manager. Once that is in place, the plan is a weekly release cadence, 
which should be sufficient for these kinds of issues.

> Reduce garbage created under high load
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15177
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15177
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2016-01-26 at 10.03.48 PM.png, Screen Shot 
> 2016-01-26 at 10.03.56 PM.png, Screen Shot 2016-01-26 at 10.06.16 PM.png, 
> Screen Shot 2016-01-26 at 10.15.15 PM.png, hbase-15177_v0.patch, 
> hbase-15177_v1.patch, hbase-15177_v2.patch
>
>
> I have been doing some profiling of the garbage being created. The idea was 
> to follow up on HBASE-14490 and experiment with offheap IPC byte buffers and 
> byte buffer re-use. However, without changing the IPC byte buffers for now, 
> there are a couple of (easy) improvements that I've identified from 
> profiling: 
> 1. RPCServer.Connection.processRequest() should work with ByteBuffer instead 
> of byte[] and not-recreate CodedInputStream a few times. 
> 2. RSRpcServices.getRegion() allocates two byte arrays for region, while only 
> 1 is needed.
> 3. AnnotationReadingPriorityFunction is very expensive in allocations. Mainly 
> it allocates the regionName byte[] to get the table name. We already set the 
> priority for most of the operations (multi, get, increment, etc) but we are 
> only reading the priority in case of multi. We should use the priority from 
> the client side. 
> Lets do the simple improvements in this patch, we can get to IPC buffer 
> re-use in HBASE-14490. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to