[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15271196#comment-15271196
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-15600:
---------------------------------------

bq. Better take this miniBatchOp.getOperationsFromCoprocessors(i - firstIndex) 
into a local variable and use that.. Else there is always a chance to miss one 
place 
Good catch. Addressed in v6. 
bq. If the other jira can committed 1st, we can change here to use 
getRowLockInternal?
{{get rowLock()}} in this case is better since these are Mutations coming from 
the CP. It is not clear the CP will only give Mutations that fall in the region 
boundaries, so we should opt for the safe approach. 


> Add provision for adding mutations to memstore or able to write to same 
> region in batchMutate coprocessor hooks
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15600
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15600
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla
>            Assignee: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 0.98.20
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-15600.patch, HBASE-15600_v1.patch, 
> HBASE-15600_v2.patch, hbase-15600_v3.patch, hbase-15600_v4.patch, 
> hbase-15600_v5.patch
>
>
> As part of PHOENIX-1734 we need to write the index updates to same region 
> from coprocessors but writing from batchMutate API is not allowed because of 
> mvcc. 
> Raised PHOENIX-2742 to discuss any alternative way to write to the same 
> region directly or not but not having any proper solution there.
> Currently we have provision to write wal edits from coprocessors. We can set 
> wal edits in MiniBatchOperationInProgress.
> {noformat}
>   /**
>    * Sets the walEdit for the operation(Mutation) at the specified position.
>    * @param index
>    * @param walEdit
>    */
>   public void setWalEdit(int index, WALEdit walEdit) {
>     this.walEditsFromCoprocessors[getAbsoluteIndex(index)] = walEdit;
>   }
> {noformat}
> Similarly we can allow to write mutations from coprocessors to memstore as 
> well. Or else we should provide the batch mutation API allow write in batch 
> mutate coprocessors.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to