[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15287364#comment-15287364 ]
Appy commented on HBASE-15841: ------------------------------ Good catch [~jerryhe]. Looking at master branch commit. - Shouldn't you also update opts.size? - Also, how is {{else if (.....)}} different from last {{else}}. Can't we just have an 'else'. - I think we should throw a fatal message if both --size and --rows are specified. What do you think? > Performance Evaluation tool total rows may not be set correctly > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-15841 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15841 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jerry He > Assignee: Jerry He > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 1.2.2 > > Attachments: HBASE-15841-branch-1.patch, HBASE-15841-master.patch > > > Carried my comment on HBASE-15403 to here: > Recently when I ran PerformanceEvaluation, I did notice some problem with the > number of rows. > hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable1 > randomWrite 1 > hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable5 > randomWrite 5 > hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable10 > randomWrite 10 > hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable10 > randomWrite 20 > All produced similar number of rows, and on the file system, they look like > in similar size as well: > hadoop fs -du -h /apps/hbase/data/data/default > 786.5 M /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable1 > 786.0 M /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable10 > 782.0 M /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable20 > 713.4 M /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable5 > HBase is 1.2.0. Looks like a regression somewhere. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)