[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311691#comment-15311691
 ] 

Phil Yang commented on HBASE-9465:
----------------------------------

Hi all,
I'm going to pick up this issue to make replication log pushing serially in 
region+peer level. The brief idea is to prevent pushing logs if there are any 
logs with smaller sequence id which are not pushed to this peer cluster, by 
saving some barrier/position information in hbase:meta table. We should 
consider various cases so I will post a designing doc these days. Thanks.

> HLog entries are not pushed to peer clusters serially when region-move or RS 
> failure in master cluster
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver, Replication
>            Reporter: Honghua Feng
>
> When region-move or RS failure occurs in master cluster, the hlog entries 
> that are not pushed before region-move or RS-failure will be pushed by 
> original RS(for region move) or another RS which takes over the remained hlog 
> of dead RS(for RS failure), and the new entries for the same region(s) will 
> be pushed by the RS which now serves the region(s), but they push the hlog 
> entries of a same region concurrently without coordination.
> This treatment can possibly lead to data inconsistency between master and 
> peer clusters:
> 1. there are put and then delete written to master cluster
> 2. due to region-move / RS-failure, they are pushed by different 
> replication-source threads to peer cluster
> 3. if delete is pushed to peer cluster before put, and flush and 
> major-compact occurs in peer cluster before put is pushed to peer cluster, 
> the delete is collected and the put remains in peer cluster
> In this scenario, the put remains in peer cluster, but in master cluster the 
> put is masked by the delete, hence data inconsistency between master and peer 
> clusters



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to