[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15319115#comment-15319115
]
stack commented on HBASE-15978:
-------------------------------
Which issue?
We have a Service that is annotated Private.
{code}
/**
* Simple Service.
*/
// This is a WIP. We have Services throughout hbase. Either have all implement
what is here or
// just remove this as an experiment that did not work out.
// TODO: Move on to guava Service after we update our guava version; later
guava has nicer
// Service implmentation.
// TODO: Move all Services on to this one Interface.
@InterfaceAudience.Private
public interface Service {
{code}
> Netty API leaked into public API
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15978
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15978
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Noticed out public
> {{[client.Future|http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/Future.html]}}
> interface extends Netty, which means our public API is bound to a specific
> Netty API and release. IIRC we were minimizing our public-facing surface area
> and asserting ownership over the whole of it so as to control our
> compatibility. Ie, we've done this with Protobuf as well. Not sure if this
> has made it back to other branches.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
