[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15343098#comment-15343098
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16032:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.1-JDK7 #1734 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.1-JDK7/1734/])
HBASE-16032 Possible memory leak in StoreScanner (liyu: rev 
591f33750630a1586aa724cd961623e0efe905e2)
* hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/StoreScanner.java
HBASE-16032 Possible memory leak in StoreScanner, addendum (liyu: rev 
4e2649e0391258b63f2871c0f31e126d778243a4)
* 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/StoreScanner.java


> Possible memory leak in StoreScanner
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16032
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16032
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.1, 1.1.5, 0.98.20
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.6, 1.3.1, 0.98.21, 1.2.3
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16032.patch, HBASE-16032_v2.patch, 
> HBASE-16032_v3.patch, HBASE-16032_v4.patch
>
>
> We observed frequent fullGC of RS in our production environment, and after 
> analyzing the heapdump, we found large memory occupancy by 
> HStore#changedReaderObservers, the map is surprisingly containing 7500w 
> objects...
> After some debugging, I located some possible memory leak in StoreScanner 
> constructor:
> {code}
>   public StoreScanner(Store store, ScanInfo scanInfo, Scan scan, final 
> NavigableSet<byte[]> columns,
>       long readPt)
>   throws IOException {
>     this(store, scan, scanInfo, columns, readPt, scan.getCacheBlocks());
>     if (columns != null && scan.isRaw()) {
>       throw new DoNotRetryIOException("Cannot specify any column for a raw 
> scan");
>     }
>     matcher = new ScanQueryMatcher(scan, scanInfo, columns,
>         ScanType.USER_SCAN, Long.MAX_VALUE, HConstants.LATEST_TIMESTAMP,
>         oldestUnexpiredTS, now, store.getCoprocessorHost());
>     this.store.addChangedReaderObserver(this);
>     // Pass columns to try to filter out unnecessary StoreFiles.
>     List<KeyValueScanner> scanners = getScannersNoCompaction();
>     ...
>     seekScanners(scanners, matcher.getStartKey(), explicitColumnQuery
>         && lazySeekEnabledGlobally, parallelSeekEnabled);
>     ...
>     resetKVHeap(scanners, store.getComparator());
>   }
> {code}
> If there's any Exception thrown after 
> {{this.store.addChangedReaderObserver(this)}}, the returned scanner might be 
> null and there's no chance to remove the scanner from changedReaderObservers, 
> like in {{HRegion#get}}
> {code}
>     RegionScanner scanner = null;
>     try {
>       scanner = getScanner(scan);
>       scanner.next(results);
>     } finally {
>       if (scanner != null)
>         scanner.close();
>     }
> {code}
> What's more, all exception thrown in the {{HRegion#getScanner}} path will 
> cause scanner==null then memory leak, so we also need to handle this part.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to