[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15381761#comment-15381761
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
-----------------------------------
And IMO, the filter based SQM is a 'nice to have'. It does not simplify the
logic here, it is only a way to construct SQM. Since we have priority here,
i.e., 'a hierarchy of filters', and the result is not only 'accept or not
accept', I'm not sure whether it will be a better construction way...
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
> -------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16225
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
>
> As said in HBASE-16223, the code of {{ScanQueryMatcher}} is too complicated.
> I suggest that we can abstract an interface and implement several sub classes
> which separate different logic into different implementations. For example,
> the requirements of compaction and user scan are different, now we also need
> to consider the logic of user scan even if we only want to add a logic for
> compaction. And at least, the raw scan does not need a query matcher... we
> can implement a dummy query matcher for it.
> Suggestions are welcomed. Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
