[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15414766#comment-15414766
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-16308:
-------------------------------

v13 Fix fact that I was not initializing RpcController in ScannerCallable.

> Contain protobuf references
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Protobufs
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16308.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.002.patch, HBASE-16308.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.004.patch, HBASE-16308.master.005.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.006.patch, HBASE-16308.master.006.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.007.patch, HBASE-16308.master.008.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.009.patch, HBASE-16308.master.010.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.011.patch, HBASE-16308.master.012.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.013.patch
>
>
> Clean up our protobuf references so contained to just a few classes rather 
> than being spread about the codebase. Doing this work will make it easier 
> landing the parent issue and will make it more clear where the division 
> between shaded protobuf and unshaded protobuf lies (we need to continue with 
> unshaded protobuf for HDFS references by AsyncWAL and probably EndPoint 
> Coprocessors)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to