[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508566#comment-15508566 ]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-15921: ------------------------------- Yes, I think it's both ok to abstract an AsyncTable interface or just add some async interfaces in existing Table, I guess the former is more clear? which do you prefer? :-) > Add first AsyncTable impl and create TableImpl based on it > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-15921 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15921 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jurriaan Mous > Assignee: Jurriaan Mous > Attachments: HBASE-15921.demo.patch, HBASE-15921.patch, > HBASE-15921.v1.patch > > > First we create an AsyncTable interface with implementation without the Scan > functionality. Those will land in a separate patch since they need a refactor > of existing scans. > Also added is a new TableImpl to replace HTable. It uses the AsyncTableImpl > internally and should be a bit faster because it does jump through less hoops > to do ProtoBuf transportation. This way we can run all existing tests on the > AsyncTableImpl to guarantee its quality. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)