[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15546483#comment-15546483
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-16765:
---------------------------------------

Yeah... No tests, etc copyright, etc, etc. Was just getting a feeling for what 
people think.

Do we need to be more aggressive in preventing the splitting in large clusters? 
In a 1000 node cluster even small table pretty quickly grow to 2000 regions.

> Improve IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16765
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16765
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>         Attachments: 16765-0.98.txt
>
>
> We just did some experiments on some larger clusters and found that while 
> using IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy generally works well and is 
> very convenient, it does tend to produce too many regions.
> Since the logic is - by design - local, checking the number of regions of the 
> table in question on the local server only, we end with more regions then 
> necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to