[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164501#comment-13164501 ]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-4972: --------------------------------------- * HBASE-3848 This work has been idle since Jun/11 * HBASE-3892 Comments say trunk doesn't need, but no test case so can't verify without effort. Seems to have significant differences between 0.90 and 0.92. * HBASE-3906 Comments say doesn't make sense on trunk. * HBASE-3989 Comments say not needed on trunk * HBASE-4109 Comments say not needed on trunk * HBASE-4160 Patch and commit present but does not contain name HBASE-4160. * HBASE-4423 Contained in 0.92's HBASE-4238 > Investigate and port patches on 0.90 branch that are not on 0.92/trunk branch. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-4972 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4972 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.92.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.92.0 > > > There are several issues that have been committed in the 0.90 branch but were > not in trunk/0.92 branch. These regressions should be "forward" ported. > HBASE-3320 ! > HBASE-3380 ! -> HBASE-4610 is a jira to backports this, but it is not done. > HBASE-3410 ! > HBASE-3501 ! > HBASE-3714 ! > HBASE-3729 !! Marked in 0.92 but not committed there, committed in 0.90 > branch. > HBASE-3848 ! > HBASE-3892 ! * Comments say trunk does not need. > HBASE-3906 ! > HBASE-3989 ! > HBASE-4109 ! > HBASE-4160 !! Marked resolved 0.90.5, but no corresponding commit in either > 0.90 or 0.92 > HBASE-4423 ! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira