[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164501#comment-13164501
]
Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-4972:
---------------------------------------
* HBASE-3848 This work has been idle since Jun/11
* HBASE-3892 Comments say trunk doesn't need, but no test case so can't verify
without effort. Seems to have significant differences between 0.90 and 0.92.
* HBASE-3906 Comments say doesn't make sense on trunk.
* HBASE-3989 Comments say not needed on trunk
* HBASE-4109 Comments say not needed on trunk
* HBASE-4160 Patch and commit present but does not contain name HBASE-4160.
* HBASE-4423 Contained in 0.92's HBASE-4238
> Investigate and port patches on 0.90 branch that are not on 0.92/trunk branch.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4972
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4972
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.92.0
> Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
> Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.92.0
>
>
> There are several issues that have been committed in the 0.90 branch but were
> not in trunk/0.92 branch. These regressions should be "forward" ported.
> HBASE-3320 !
> HBASE-3380 ! -> HBASE-4610 is a jira to backports this, but it is not done.
> HBASE-3410 !
> HBASE-3501 !
> HBASE-3714 !
> HBASE-3729 !! Marked in 0.92 but not committed there, committed in 0.90
> branch.
> HBASE-3848 !
> HBASE-3892 ! * Comments say trunk does not need.
> HBASE-3906 !
> HBASE-3989 !
> HBASE-4109 !
> HBASE-4160 !! Marked resolved 0.90.5, but no corresponding commit in either
> 0.90 or 0.92
> HBASE-4423 !
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
