[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15639302#comment-15639302
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-16992:
----------------------------------------

The note to be added in the javadoc at
MiniBatchOperationInProgress # addOperationsFromCP(int index, Mutation[] 
newOperations)
At the CP hook place, it makes not much sense.
Also pls add some comments around the code in HRegion that we use Durability of 
the original Mutation for these CP passed mutation

> The usage of mutation from CP is weird.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16992
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16992
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>            Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16992.branch-1.v0.patch
>
>
> {code:title=HRegion#doMiniBatchMutate|borderStyle=solid}
> Mutation cpMutation = cpMutations[j];
> Map<byte[], List<Cell>> cpFamilyMap = cpMutation.getFamilyCellMap();
> checkAndPrepareMutation(cpMutation, replay, cpFamilyMap, now);
>  // Acquire row locks. If not, the whole batch will fail.
> acquiredRowLocks.add(getRowLockInternal(cpMutation.getRow(), true));
> if (cpMutation.getDurability() == Durability.SKIP_WAL) {
>   recordMutationWithoutWal(cpFamilyMap);
> }
> // Returned mutations from coprocessor correspond to the Mutation at index i. 
> We can
>  // directly add the cells from those mutations to the familyMaps of this 
> mutation.
> mergeFamilyMaps(familyMaps[i], cpFamilyMap); // will get added to the 
> memstore later
> {code}
> 1. Does the returned mutation from coprocessor have the same row as the 
> corresponded mutation? If so, the acquiredRowLocks() can be saved. If not, 
> the corresponded mutation may maintain the cells with different row due to 
> mergeFamilyMaps().
> 2. Is returned mutation's durability useful? If so, we should deal with the 
> different durabilities before mergeFamilyMaps(). If not, the 
> recordMutationWithoutWal can be saved. 
> 3. If both the returned mutation and corresponded mutation have 
> Durability.SKIP_WAL, the recordMutationWithoutWal() may record the duplicate 
> cells due to mergeFamilyMaps().
> Any comment? Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to