[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15682572#comment-15682572
 ] 

Yu Li commented on HBASE-17138:
-------------------------------

So here I'd like we make a consensus on whether to 1) backport HBASE-11425 to 
branch-1 or 2) upload our patches for our customized 1.1.2 here. The former is 
more official and means community will maintain the backported feature, but as 
[~anoop.hbase] mentioned there'll be some more efforts to keep compatibility so 
more than only HBASE-11425, and the latter is easier for us but harder for 
others to use due to code-base diverge.

Maybe some kind of voting in need here? +1 for backport and -1 for only 
uploading existing patches? Let me know your thoughts please, thanks. 
[~anoop.hbase] [~stack] [~ram_krish] [~apurtell] [~enis] [~ndimiduk] [~Apache9] 
[~busbey] [~mantonov] [~mbertozzi]

And comments from others are also welcome. Thanks.

> Backport read-path offheap (HBASE-11425) to branch-1
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17138
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17138
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>
> From the 
> [thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-user/201611.mbox/%3CCAM7-19%2Bn7cEiY4H9iLQ3N9V0NXppOPduZwk-hhgNLEaJfiV3kA%40mail.gmail.com%3E]
>  of sharing our experience and performance data of read-path offheap usage in 
> Alibaba search, we could see people are positive to have HBASE-11425 in 
> branch-1, so I'd like to create a JIRA and move the discussion and decision 
> making here.
> Echoing some comments from the mail thread:
> Bryan:
> Is the backported patch available anywhere? If it ends up not getting 
> officially backported to branch-1 due to 2.0 around the corner, some of us 
> who build our own deploy may want to integrate into our builds
> Andrew:
> Yes, please, the patches will be useful to the community even if we decide 
> not to backport into an official 1.x release.
> Enis:
> I don't see any reason why we cannot backport to branch-1.
> Ted:
> Opening a JIRA would be fine. This makes it easier for people to obtain the 
> patch(es)
> Nick:
> From the DISCUSS thread re: EOL of 1.1, it seems we'll continue to
> support 1.x releases for some time... I would guess these will be
> maintained until 2.2 at least. Therefore, offheap patches that have seen
> production exposure seem like a reasonable candidate for backport, perhaps in 
> a 1.4 or 1.5 release timeframe.
> Anoop:
> Because of some compatibility issues, we decide that this will be done in 2.0 
> only..  Ya as Andy said, it would be great to share the 1.x backported 
> patches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to