[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15772118#comment-15772118 ]
ChiaPing Tsai commented on HBASE-17174: --------------------------------------- failed test isn't related to v12 patch, and it passes locally. > Refactor the AsyncProcess, BufferedMutatorImpl, and HTable > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-17174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai > Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-17174.v0.patch, HBASE-17174.v1.patch, > HBASE-17174.v10.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch, > HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v12.patch, HBASE-17174.v2.patch, > HBASE-17174.v3.patch, HBASE-17174.v4.patch, HBASE-17174.v5.patch, > HBASE-17174.v6.patch, HBASE-17174.v7.patch, HBASE-17174.v8.patch, > HBASE-17174.v9.patch > > > The following are reasons of refactoring. > # A update-heavy application, for example, loader, creates many > BufferedMutator for batch updates. But these BufferedMutators can’t share a > large threadpool because the shutdown() method will be called when closing > any BufferedMutator. This patch adds a flag into BufferedMutatorParams for > preventing calling the shutdown() method in BufferedMutatorImpl#close > # The AsyncProcess has the powerful traffic control, but the control is > against the single table currently. We should allow alternate traffic control > implementation for advanced user who want more control. > All suggestions are welcome. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)