[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16007653#comment-16007653
]
stack commented on HBASE-17786:
-------------------------------
+1 from me. [~busbey] Ok to commit sir?
> Create LoadBalancer perf-tests (test balancer algorithm decoupled from
> workload)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17786
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17786
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Balancer, proc-v2
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Umesh Agashe
> Labels: beginner
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17786.001.patch, HBASE-17786.002.patch,
> HBASE-17786.002.patch
>
>
> (Below is a quote from [~mbertozzi] taken from an internal issue that I'm
> moving out here)
> Add perf tools and keep monitored balancer performance (a BalancerPE-type
> thing).
> Most of the balancers should be instantiable without requiring a
> mini-cluster, and it easy to create tons of RegionInfo and ServerNames with a
> for loop.
> The balancer is just creating a map RegionInfo:ServerName.
> There are two methods to test roundRobinAssignment() and retainAssignment()
> {code}
> Map<ServerName, List<HRegionInfo>> roundRobinAssignment(
> List<HRegionInfo> regions,
> List<ServerName> servers
> ) throws HBaseIOException;
> Map<ServerName, List<HRegionInfo>> retainAssignment(
> Map<HRegionInfo, ServerName> regions,
> List<ServerName> servers
> ) throws HBaseIOException;
> {code}
> There are a bunch of obvious optimization that everyone can see just by
> looking at the code. (like replacing array with set when we do
> contains/remove operations). It will be nice to have a baseline and start
> improving from there.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
