[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16007951#comment-16007951
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-17887:
----------------------------------------

I dont mean keep scanners over old active, pipeline and snapshot. I mean over 
the active and pipeline alone.. Snapshot is any way gone now and we have the 
new file and we create a scanner over it and done the seek.  The scanners over 
active and pipeline are in proper pos already.  Creating new scanners will do 
new seeks.  Any way it is ok we fix this way now and see later any better way.  
  Ya this is a serious problem Yu Li.

> Row-level consistency is broken for read
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17887
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17887
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Umesh Agashe
>            Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.2, 1.4.1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-17887.branch-1.v0.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v1.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v2.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v3.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v4.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.branch-1.v5.patch, HBASE-17887.branch-1.v6.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.ut.patch, HBASE-17887.v0.patch, HBASE-17887.v1.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.v2.patch, HBASE-17887.v3.patch, HBASE-17887.v4.patch, 
> HBASE-17887.v5.patch, HBASE-17887.v5.patch
>
>
> As per the flaky tests dashboard here: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html,
>  It fails 30% of the time.
> While working on HBASE-17863, a few verification builds on patch failed due 
> to TestAcidGuarantees didn't pass. IMHO, the changes for HBASE-17863 are 
> unlikely to affect get/ put path.
> I ran the test with and without the patch several times locally and found 
> that TestAcidGuarantees fails without the patch similar number of times.
> Opening blocker, considering acid guarantees are critical to HBase.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to