[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022689#comment-16022689
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-18085:
--------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #3068 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/3068/])
HBASE-18085 Prevent parallel purge in ObjectPool (liyu: rev
d047cc9ecc7e0067c3b3aaeeb1600da8d774b211)
* (edit)
hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/WeakObjectPool.java
* (edit)
hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/SoftObjectPool.java
* (edit) hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/ObjectPool.java
> Prevent parallel purge in ObjectPool
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18085
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18085
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Yu Li
> Assignee: Yu Li
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: e89l05465.st3.jstack, HBASE-18085.patch,
> HBASE-18085.patch
>
>
> Parallel purge in ObjectPool is meaningless and will cause contention issue
> since {{ReferenceQueue#poll}} has synchronization (source code shown below)
> {code}
> public Reference<? extends T> poll() {
> if (head == null)
> return null;
> synchronized (lock) {
> return reallyPoll();
> }
> }
> {code}
> We observed threads blocking on the purge method while using offheap bucket
> cache, and we could easily reproduce this by testing the 100% cache hit case
> in bucket cache with enough reading threads.
> We propose to add a purgeLock and use tryLock to avoid parallel purge.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
