[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16040670#comment-16040670
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17678:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m 
1s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m 
41s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
23s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m 
50s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
18s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 16s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 16s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
23s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
31m 3s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 or 3.0.0-alpha2. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 
11s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 20s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 2m 28s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
8s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 42m 33s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.12.3 Server=1.12.3 Image:yetus/hbase:757bf37 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12871805/HBASE-17678.addendum.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-17678 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  
hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 624b26babf02 3.13.0-107-generic #154-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 20 
09:57:27 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / 1d3252e |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_131 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7128/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-client U: hbase-client |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/7128/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> FilterList with MUST_PASS_ONE may lead to redundant cells returned
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17678
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17678
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Filters
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.2.1
>         Environment: RedHat 7.x
>            Reporter: Jason Tokayer
>            Assignee: Zheng Hu
>         Attachments: HBASE-17678.addendum.patch, HBASE-17678.addendum.patch, 
> HBASE-17678.v1.patch, HBASE-17678.v1.rough.patch, HBASE-17678.v2.patch, 
> HBASE-17678.v3.patch, HBASE-17678.v4.patch, HBASE-17678.v4.patch, 
> HBASE-17678.v5.patch, HBASE-17678.v6.patch, HBASE-17678.v7.patch, 
> HBASE-17678.v7.patch, TestColumnPaginationFilterDemo.java
>
>
> When combining ColumnPaginationFilter with a single-element filterList, 
> MUST_PASS_ONE and MUST_PASS_ALL give different results when there are 
> multiple cells with the same timestamp. This is unexpected since there is 
> only a single filter in the list, and I would believe that MUST_PASS_ALL and 
> MUST_PASS_ONE should only affect the behavior of the joined filter and not 
> the behavior of any one of the individual filters. If this is not a bug then 
> it would be nice if the documentation is updated to explain this nuanced 
> behavior.
> I know that there was a decision made in an earlier Hbase version to keep 
> multiple cells with the same timestamp. This is generally fine but presents 
> an issue when using the aforementioned filter combination.
> Steps to reproduce:
> In the shell create a table and insert some data:
> {code:none}
> create 'ns:tbl',{NAME => 'family',VERSIONS => 100}
> put 'ns:tbl','row','family:name','John',1000000000000
> put 'ns:tbl','row','family:name','Jane',1000000000000
> put 'ns:tbl','row','family:name','Gil',1000000000000
> put 'ns:tbl','row','family:name','Jane',1000000000000
> {code}
> Then, use a Scala client as:
> {code:none}
> import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.filter._
> import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Bytes
> import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client._
> import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.{CellUtil, HBaseConfiguration, TableName}
> import scala.collection.mutable._
> val config = HBaseConfiguration.create()
> config.set("hbase.zookeeper.quorum", "localhost")
> config.set("hbase.zookeeper.property.clientPort", "2181")
> val connection = ConnectionFactory.createConnection(config)
> val logicalOp = FilterList.Operator.MUST_PASS_ONE
> val limit = 1
> var resultsList = ListBuffer[String]()
> for (offset <- 0 to 20 by limit) {
>       val table = connection.getTable(TableName.valueOf("ns:tbl"))
>       val paginationFilter = new ColumnPaginationFilter(limit,offset)
>       val filterList: FilterList = new FilterList(logicalOp,paginationFilter)
>       println("@ filterList = "+filterList)
>       val results = table.get(new 
> Get(Bytes.toBytes("row")).setFilter(filterList))
>       val cells = results.rawCells()
>       if (cells != null) {
>               for (cell <- cells) {
>                 val value = new String(CellUtil.cloneValue(cell))
>                 val qualifier = new String(CellUtil.cloneQualifier(cell))
>                 val family = new String(CellUtil.cloneFamily(cell))
>                 val result = "OFFSET = "+offset+":"+family + "," + qualifier 
> + "," + value + "," + cell.getTimestamp()
>                 resultsList.append(result)
>               }
>       }
> }
> resultsList.foreach(println)
> {code}
> Here are the results for different limit and logicalOp settings:
> {code:none}
> Limit = 1 & logicalOp = MUST_PASS_ALL:
> scala> resultsList.foreach(println)
> OFFSET = 0:family,name,Jane,1000000000000
> Limit = 1 & logicalOp = MUST_PASS_ONE:
> scala> resultsList.foreach(println)
> OFFSET = 0:family,name,Jane,1000000000000
> OFFSET = 1:family,name,Gil,1000000000000
> OFFSET = 2:family,name,Jane,1000000000000
> OFFSET = 3:family,name,John,1000000000000
> Limit = 2 & logicalOp = MUST_PASS_ALL:
> scala> resultsList.foreach(println)
> OFFSET = 0:family,name,Jane,1000000000000
> Limit = 2 & logicalOp = MUST_PASS_ONE:
> scala> resultsList.foreach(println)
> OFFSET = 0:family,name,Jane,1000000000000
> OFFSET = 2:family,name,Jane,1000000000000
> {code}
> So, it seems that MUST_PASS_ALL gives the expected behavior, but 
> MUST_PASS_ONE does not. Furthermore, MUST_PASS_ONE seems to give only a 
> single (not-duplicated)  within a page, but not across pages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to